This is one of those pieces written for conversation elsewhere, but I feel it worth sharing in this venue where I've expressed interest in conflict and universalism both.
---
Here is ther remark that stimulated this post:
". . . it seems that if you were, say, "German" it because you are born there, or your ancestors hail from that region. The Jew do the same thing, but use the religion of Judaism instead of a geographical region as an identifying trait. Tecnically, I guess, an athiest Jew would be an impossible term...but as the world, more or less, treats the Jewish people as a race, AND as a religion, who am I to argue?"
Here is my long response to it, edited and revised a little--
I'm not really singling out this quote but rather just choosing to type up, I guess, at this point.
European Jews are not any more representative of Jewry worldwide than are Chinese or Ethiopian Jews.
Neither Abraham nor all the sons maintained an exclusively kosher house, so to speak. Intermarriage and conversions, including significant populations of proselytes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proselytes) have been a part of the culture and religion.
For the curious as opposed to venal, selection of a few strands informing Judaism might include the following: Torah, Talmud, Mishnah, Gemara, Kabbala. Without minimal cognizance of each, there's nothing through which to view the culture and religion and its interior variants.
For any seeking the history of Judaism, there is, of course, the venerable Jewish Encyclopedia, now in the public domain and online at this address:
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/
For side-by-side ethnography, author and scholar Raphael Patai publshed two authoritative volumes: _The Arab Mind_ and _The Jewish Mind_ (I've read one and left off half way through the other but mean to return to it).
Jewish identity is many things. To ignorant others, it has been about blood or genetic inheritance, and Jews have been depicted with bigoted enthusiasm as exaggerations of the bigot's own type or as familiar boogies from folkdom.
For Jews (and if you're Jewish and would like to chat about being Jewish, because I sure would, lol, feel welcome to reach me through my main web at http://www.communicating-arts.com), possibly the single most unifying elements would be an inspired universalism first, which needs not a faith in God, and then God and identity with the Jewish people, which are a cloud (all surviving 15 million of us) as well as a "light unto the nations".
For those with affection for the "foundation texts" of any of the three monotheist religions, Jewish thought suggests that if God imparted such work to Moses, then it would have been delivered perfectly and for all time, no course corrections or rewrites necessary. The books considered divine, I think but shall be corrected if I'm wrong, lol, are just the first five books of the Old Testament or "Pentatuch". Scholars denote the second section, or the work of the prophets as "Nevi'im", and the remainder as "Ketuvim"--and I have been recently corrected: the Jewish bible (really, this is where I am starting) is the Tanakh, and all of it may be regarded as divinely inspired.
Treating the works as poetic instruction rather than explicit direction, the Jewish way has been to strive to more perfectly understand the perfect and then orient behavior and law to it. There has been no need to revert to biblical injunctions passed along through stories as the spirit of such takes always precedence over the mechanics imposed by the historical period of composition or inspiration.
That's about as simple and fast as I can type it out, but a little looking into any of the terms I've noted will open a small window into what it means to be Jewish and, for most--no people can deny they have criminals among them--what it means also to be good.
A little research also may help some understand how a process living inside a people may not have to be explicitly taught to nonetheless have itself learned and passed through from one generation to the next.
To enjoy a sense of how far afield Judaism has gone, and here the suggestion of a direct offshoot from the ancient Semitic base, I'm going to venture this reference on Judaism within the Pathan tribes of Afghanistan and Pakistan:
http://www.dangoor.com/74069.html
Again, to reinforce the thought, the Jews, having received the Torah, have long sought to understand it. The manner of thinking carries through to all humans who would wish to adopt it, but as the community itself is introspective, those who would be Jewish have only to bring themselves to it if they are able to.
Wikipedia Gateways
Tenakh: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanakh
Torah: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah
Talmud: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud
Mishnah: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mishnah
Gemara: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemara
Kabbala: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabbalah
Samaritan Pentateuch: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samaritan_Pentateuch
Nevi'im: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevi'im
Ketuvim: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketuvim
Cited Reference
Jewish Encylopedia: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/index.jsp
Katzir, Issachar. "The Israeli Source of the Pathan Tribes." From the book, Lost Tribes from Assyria, by A Avihail and A Brin, 1978.: http://www.dangoor.com/74069.html
Patai, Raphal. The Arab Mind. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1973.
Patai, Raphael. The Jewish Mind. New York: Jason Aronson, 1977.
Other Reference
Judaism 101: http://www.jewfaq.org/index.htm
Shalom!
# # #