Mediagrr19 posting Goodman, Amy. "Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Abadi joins devense team of Roxanna Saberi. Democracy Now 1 of 2." YouTube, April 30, 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5rpznVjTHQ - Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucsIja7oLMA.
Always, we get the outside of the story, the outrageous part, the visible, the public, and the highly promoted, but it takes some other effort to get under the hood, open up the valve cover, and scope the pistons and sample the fuel and gauge the power of the thing.
Reading about Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani just a few hours ago, I was struck by the depth of the intellectual organization and institutional array in the contemporary Iranian governing complex. No one overlooks the former President of Iran in any orientation to political expression or press freedom in the state. However, there are other nuts and bolts.
Start with Rafsanjani's participation on the Assembly of Experts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_of_Experts
Move on to the Expediency Discernment Council: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/edc.htm
Move on to the rants, for example: Farhat Quam Maquami's diatribe that datelined May 30, 2005 at Iranian.com, starts this way, "The multifaceted Rafsanjani family has converted Iranian wealth into billions-dollar investments in the United States, Canada and Europe," before spinning around to "Islamic Republic is a trade name, a slogan used for propaganda, and an empty phrase which has been coined to subjugate people who believe in Islam all over the world. It is a strange dictatorship, baptized in blood baths and terror established in 1979. It is ironical that the system which murdered many as "Corrupt on Earth" and "Warrior against God" has become the symbol of corruption and socioeconomic oppression." Source: http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2005/May/Rafsanjani/index.html
Now here's a trick: corroborate the claims online.
Try.
Bureaucracies and their investigators--auditors, if you will--have a term for burrowing through information translucence and opacity toward a believable and trustworty, valid and reliable, clarity: "peeling back the onion."
One may see the outside of a problem but getting into its workings requires a different sort of sight and illumination.
If a state were a poem, one would want to gather in its history, themes, characters, allusions, and references; one would want its contemporaries gathered on the same table, opened to pages referencing similar things.
Decent lighting, a highlighter, and a cup of coffee wouldn't hurt: welcome to the equivalent of an endless Ph.Dville.
Good poets know good readers will discern the moving parts of their poem, so they plant each word and phrase carefuly, knowing, hoping, expecting the inclined to look over the form and shape of the work before laying it out, line linked to line linked to former works linked to competitions between composers, and from that knowing how the poem works, how its ambiguities intrigue, and knowing also how to pass the knowledge of it down to another generation of readers.
# # #